AEW star MVP has some strong opinions about WWE's Chief Content Officer, Triple H. In a recent interview, MVP takes a dig at Triple H's ability to elevate other wrestlers, suggesting that he's not very good at it. This comes as no surprise, given MVP's history of criticizing Triple H's leadership and decision-making in WWE.
The discussion revolves around the idea that a wrestler who can make others look good is more valuable than one who only knows how to get themselves over. MVP uses The Undertaker as an example of a top guy who has helped numerous stars, including the not-so-great Khali. On the other hand, MVP highlights Triple H's struggles in this area, asking his listeners to name a single star that Triple H has successfully elevated.
When Jeff Hardy's name is brought up, MVP dismisses it, recalling a specific instance where Triple H used a cheap finish to win a match, instead of a more dramatic and genuine display of injury.
MVP concludes that both The Undertaker and Triple H were top guys who drew a lot of money and were players, but the Undertaker's ability to help others is what sets him apart. MVP jokes about Triple H's backstage politics, suggesting that he might have used underhanded tactics to get Vince McMahon to put someone else over.
While MVP may be exaggerating Triple H's shortcomings, his point about the importance of a wrestler's ability to elevate others is valid. Triple H's reign as a top guy in WWE has been criticized for its lack of substance and genuine star power. The question remains: who else can Triple H claim to have helped get over besides Randy Orton and Batista?
This article highlights the ongoing debate about the value of a wrestler's ability to make others look good, and the impact it has on their legacy. It also raises questions about the criteria for evaluating a wrestler's success and the role of leadership in professional wrestling.
